MAIN SUBTYPES OF DYSLEXIA

READ Learning Center Sacramento

Identifying Dyslexia by Subtype

By Leah Skinner | February 2026

The short answer

Dyslexia is not one condition. Research identifies multiple distinct profiles, each driven by a different breakdown in the reading system, each requiring a different intervention. A comprehensive assessment identifies which profile your child has. Without it, intervention is a guess. This page explains how deep dyslexia assessments improve learner outcomes by identifying each child’s unique profile and creating a clear, actionable roadmap that educators and families can follow.

Most parents leave a dyslexia evaluation with a label. What they actually need is a profile. The label tells you your child has dyslexia. The profile tells you what to do about it. I know because I sat in that chair too. And without the profile, the intervention that follows is a guess.

Here’s what most parents are never told. Dyslexia is not one condition. It presents across multiple distinct profiles, each driven by a different breakdown in the reading system. The intervention must match the breakdown. Two children sitting in the same classroom, both labeled dyslexic, may need programs that look nothing alike. Giving them the same program doesn’t help one of them.

The Research Finding

“Two children can both have dyslexia and require completely different interventions. A reader with weaknesses in phonological awareness requires a different type of intervention than a reader who has slow naming speed. Without assessment that measures both independently, you cannot tell them apart.”

— PMC: Use of Cognitive Tests in the Assessment of Dyslexia

What Happens Without Subtype Identification

Research has put a number on it. And it is not a small number. Children who received intervention not matched to their deficit profile showed no meaningful progress after 100 hours of instruction. The same 100 hours, matched to the right profile, moved children from below grade level to the average range — a documented 22-point standard score gain.

100 hours is approximately one full school year of intervention sessions. The only variable between those two outcomes was whether the assessment identified the correct target first.

100 hrs Wasted on intervention not matched to the correct subtype. A full school year with no measurable gain.
6 Distinct dyslexia subtypes identified by research, each requiring a different primary intervention approach.
22 pts Standard score gain when subtype-matched intervention is applied correctly. Below grade level to average range.
1st
step
The assessment is not a bureaucratic step. It is the clinical instrument that makes targeted intervention possible.

The Six Profiles — And What Each One Requires

In the classroom, two of these children can look identical. The breakdown underneath is completely different. The intervention must match the breakdown, not the behavior.

Subtype What This Child Looks Like Intervention Must Target
Phonological
Cannot decode unfamiliar words. Struggles to segment and manipulate speech sounds. Fails nonsense word tasks. Guesses at words using context and memory. Structured Literacy instruction (Orton-Gillingham, Wilson, Barton) with heavy emphasis on phonological awareness and decoding.
Surface / Orthographic
Can decode phonetically but reads slowly because irregular words aren’t automatic. Spells phonetically (“sed” for “said”). Phonics intact — sight word memory weak. Structured Literacy with heavier weighting on orthographic awareness. A good Structured Literacy program addresses both phonological and orthographic processing simultaneously — the orthographic component needs to be front and center for this profile.
Double Deficit
Deficits in both phonological processing and rapid naming speed. Weakest reader profile. Struggles with decoding and cannot automate even words that are learned. Structured Literacy with intensive weighting across both phonological and fluency components. Most demanding profile to remediate. Outcomes are good when correctly identified early.
RAN / Fluency
Phonological awareness is intact but reading is very slow. Can decode accurately but cannot automate. Often misidentified as “not really dyslexic.” Structured Literacy builds fluency through automatic decoding. Additional fluency practice should be layered in. The goal is automaticity — accurate reading that no longer requires conscious effort.
Working Memory
Decodes words but cannot hold enough of the sentence in memory to comprehend it. Can read words accurately but loses meaning by paragraph end. Working memory support strategies alongside decoding instruction. Must be identified separately or comprehension deficits will be misattributed.
Mixed / Comorbid
Deficits across multiple areas. Often co-occurs with ADHD, dysgraphia, or dyscalculia. Profile does not fit cleanly into one subtype. Structured Literacy with intervention design that accounts for all presenting areas. Co-occurring conditions such as ADHD or dysgraphia must be identified and addressed alongside the literacy program.

Why the profile matters

A child with a predominantly orthographic profile needs a Structured Literacy program that addresses both phonological and orthographic processing simultaneously — with orthographic awareness front and center. When intervention is weighted toward the wrong area, progress stalls. The assessment tells you exactly where to weight it.

Why Generic Assessment Falls Short

School evaluations are designed to answer one question: does this child qualify for services? That’s it. Not what’s wrong. Not what to do. Just whether the threshold is met.

A screener tells you a reading problem likely exists. It cannot tell you why. It cannot identify the profile. It cannot guide intervention.

What each tool tells you — and what it can’t

Tool What It Tells You What It Cannot Tell You
School evaluation Eligibility for special ed. Broad reading level. Subtype. Which cognitive process is intact vs. impaired. Intervention target.
Screener Risk flag. A reading problem likely exists. Everything needed to build an intervention. Subtype. Profile. Roadmap.
Comprehensive assessment Which processes are intact and which are impaired. Subtype. Profile. Specific intervention roadmap. N/A — this is the tool that answers the right questions.

What a Deep Assessment Actually Measures

Each component of a comprehensive assessment builds a different piece of your child’s learning profile. Together they reveal not just where the difficulty is, but how severe, what strengths exist, and exactly where intervention needs to be weighted.

What We Measure What It Tells Us What It Reveals About the Profile
Phonological Processing Ability to hear, segment, and manipulate individual sounds in spoken words. Primary indicator for Phonological dyslexia and Double Deficit.
Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) Speed of retrieving familiar labels from memory. Measured independently of phonological processing. RAN/Fluency and Double Deficit. Cannot be inferred from phonological scores alone.
Decoding Skills Ability to sound out both real and nonsense words. Isolates the phonological decoding route by removing memory compensation. Phonological dyslexia. Distinguishes true decoding deficit from compensated reading.
Reading Fluency Speed, accuracy, and expression in connected text. Gap between decoding ability and automaticity. RAN/Fluency subtype. Distinguishes accuracy problems from speed problems.
Spelling & Writing Written expression and orthographic processing. Also screens for dysgraphia comorbidity. Orthographic deficit. Comorbid dysgraphia. Surface and Mixed presentations.
Visual Attention Visual processing and tracking abilities that support reading accuracy and efficiency. Visual processing contributions to reading difficulty. Informs accommodation recommendations.
Comprehension Reading vs. listening comprehension comparison. Strong listening but weak reading points to the reading system, not language ability or intelligence. Distinguishes dyslexia from broader language processing disorders. Critical for correct diagnosis.
Math Skills Screening for dyscalculia when indicated by history or presenting concerns. Dyscalculia. Mixed learning disability profiles. Co-occurring conditions that affect intervention design.
Oral Expression, Vocabulary & Picture Analogies Measures verbal reasoning, expressive language, and conceptual thinking independently of reading. Often a significant strength in dyslexic learners. Documents the gap between a child’s cognitive ability and their reading performance — critical for showing what the child is truly capable of.

What This Means for Your Child

Getting the diagnosis is not the finish line. It is the starting gun. What comes next — the intervention, the program, the hours — only works if it is aimed at the right target. Every child presents with a unique profile. The areas of difficulty, their severity, how they combine — different for every learner. That profile is what makes targeted intervention possible.

At READ Learning Center, our assessment builds that complete picture — strengths and difficulties across phonological processing, decoding, rapid naming, reading fluency, spelling and writing, visual attention, oral expression, vocabulary, comprehension, and math screening when indicated. The report tells you where your child is, what is driving the difficulty, and exactly where intervention needs to be aimed.

I was not about to let my son fail. That is why we do this work.

Stop guessing. Start knowing.

comprehensive dyslexia assessment is the first step toward an intervention that actually works. Call us at (916) 234-5880 to schedule.

Sources

  1. PMC: Use of Cognitive Tests in the Assessment of Dyslexia (NCBI)
  2. Vellutino et al. — Cognitive Profiles of Difficult-to-Remediate and Readily Remediated Poor Readers, Journal of Educational Psychology
  3. Wolf, M. & Bowers, P. — The Double-Deficit Hypothesis for the Developmental Dyslexias, Journal of Educational Psychology
  4. Annals of Dyslexia — Subtype-specific intervention outcome research, multiple volumes
  5. International Dyslexia Association — Definition and Classification

Leah Skinner breaks down the six dyslexia subtypes, explains what a comprehensive assessment actually measures, and shows why subtype identification is the single most important step before any intervention begins.

Chapters

  • 0:00 —  Welcome and why this matters
  • 0:36 —  Label vs. profile — the fundamental difference
  • 1:32 —  The real cost of guessing wrong
  • 2:04 —  100 hours: a full school year with no progress
  • 2:38 —  The 22-point gain: same effort, right target
  • 3:19 —  The six dyslexia profiles explained
  • 5:04 —  Why school evaluations aren't enough
  • 5:25 —  What a deep assessment actually does
  • 6:21 —   The diagnosis is the starting gun
  • 6:48 —  You can have a map — not guesswork
View Transcript

0:00
Hello and welcome. I’m so glad you’re here. I know that if you’re watching this, you’re on a really personal journey to understand your child’s learning. And my hope today is to just create a little space of clarity and honestly, a lot of hope for you. We’re going to dive into why understanding your child’s specific type of dyslexia is probably the single most important step you can take to help them truly, truly thrive.

0:24
This quote, wow, it just gets right to the heart of everything, doesn’t it? I know that feeling so well, sitting in that evaluation, your heart just pounding, and then you walk out with a single word, dyslexia.

0:36
But what are you supposed to do with that? As the author says, I know because I sat in that chair too. A label can feel like an ending, but a profile? Oh, a profile is a beginning. And this is the fundamental difference. Right here. A label just confirms that there’s a challenge. A profile is your roadmap. It literally maps out the beautiful, unique landscape of your child’s mind, showing you their strengths and the exact places they need support so you know precisely which path to take. It’s what turns all that confusion into a clear, actionable plan. OK, so this is the thing that most parents are never told. And it’s so important. Dyslexia isn’t just one thing. It’s not a monolith. It shows up in a bunch of different ways because it can be caused by different little breakdowns in the brain’s reading system. And that means that two kids, both with that same dyslexia label, might need completely different kinds of help.

1:32
You know, this research really puts it into perspective. The stakes are so high. If you don’t know exactly what the underlying issue is, you can’t pick the right tools to fix it. You’re just guessing. And when it comes to our kids and their confidence and their future, guessing just isn’t an option. And that guessing, it has a real cost. This isn’t just a theory. The research has actually put a number on it. And it’s a number that represents so much time and so much effort and so much hope. 100 hours.

2:04
Just let that sink in for a minute. That’s basically a full school year of intervention sessions, a whole year of your child showing up trying their best, a year of you rearranging your life to get them there.

2:15
All of that energy poured into a program that wasn’t matched to their specific profile. And the result of all that work?

2:23
No meaningful progress. It’s just heartbreaking. Can you imagine the frustration for your child, who is trying so, so hard, but just not getting anywhere, and the weight on you as a parent watching them struggle?

2:38
That lost time, it’s so much more than just a number. But here’s the hopeful part. Now, let’s look at the same 100 hours, same amazing kid, same dedicated family. The only thing we’re changing is that the intervention is now precisely, perfectly matched to their unique learning profile. And the impact? A documented 22-point jump in their standard score. I mean, that’s not just progress. That is life-changing. That is the difference between feeling stuck and left behind and confidently moving right into the average range with their peers. It’s the same amount of effort, just finally aimed at the right target. This is what happens when we stop guessing and start knowing. So how do we find that target?

3:19
It all starts with understanding these different profiles. We’re going to walk through the six main subtypes now. And please, don’t let this feel overwhelming. My real hope is that maybe, just maybe, you’ll see your child in one of these descriptions, and it will feel like a light bulb turning on.

3:36
OK, first up is the phonological profile. This is what many of us think of as classic dyslexia. It’s a child who really struggles to hear and work with the individual sounds and words, you know, like hearing the p sound in spin.

3:49
Then you have the surface or orthographic profile. This kid might be pretty good at sounding out new words, but they read so slowly because their brain doesn’t store those tricky, irregular words like said or friend as pictures. You can already see how they need totally different kinds of practice, right?

4:04
Next, we have what’s called the double deficit profile. This is when a child has trouble with both the sound processing we just talked about and something called rapid naming, which is just how quickly their brain can name things like colors or letters. Then there’s the RAN or rapid naming profile all on its own. These kids are often really accurate readers, but they are just so slow. Reading never becomes automatic for them.

4:28
And then there’s a working memory profile. This is the child who might read every single word in a paragraph perfectly, but by the time they get to the end, they’ve forgotten how it started, so they have no idea what it was about.

4:39
And finally, you have the mixed profile, which is when a child has a few of these challenges at once, often alongside something like ADHD. Each one of these needs such a unique, tailored plan. So now you’re probably thinking, okay, this is great, but how in the world do I find out which profile my child has? This is where it’s so important to talk about having the right tool for the job, because not all evaluations are the same. Not even close.

5:04
This slide really says it all. A typical school evaluation is designed to answer one question, and one question only. Does this child check enough boxes to qualify for services? It’s really about eligibility. But a deep assessment? Its entire purpose is to tell you what to do. It’s the difference between a gatekeeper and a guide.

5:25
A deep assessment is the tool that actually builds that roadmap we’ve been talking about. It goes way beyond just a simple reading score. It looks under the hood of the car, so to speak, to figure out why things aren’t running smoothly. It finds the root cause so we can create a truly personalized plan. And as you can see, it looks at all these different puzzle pieces. It measures sound processing and naming speed and decoding all separately. This is how you get that complete three-dimensional picture of your child’s brain, identifying not just their challenges, but their amazing strengths too. So let’s bring this all home. When you have this information, it truly changes everything. It’s the thing that moves your family from a place of confusion and frustration to a place of empowerment with a clear, hopeful path forward. I want you to just take a breath and really let this one sink in. Hearing that word, dyslexia, can feel so heavy. It can feel like the end of something, but it’s not.

6:21
It’s the beginning of a new chapter, a better, more informed one. It’s the starting gun that says, OK, we know what we’re aiming at now. Let’s go. When it all comes down to it, this is the truth. Your child’s unique profile is everything. It’s the key that unlocks the door to an intervention that is tailor-made for them, an intervention that finally honors all of their hard work and lets them see the incredible progress they so, so deserve.

6:48
This journey can feel so big and overwhelming, I know. But it does not have to be a journey of guesswork. You can have a map. You can have real answers. You can know with confidence exactly what to do next to help your child unlock their incredible potential. You are their fiercest advocate, and you can absolutely do this.

0:00 / 0:00

Identifying Dyslexia by Subtype

with Leah Skinner, M.Ed. — READ Learning Center

Leah Skinner walks through the research on dyslexia subtypes, explains what each component of the assessment battery is actually measuring, and describes what a comprehensive assessment report gives families that a screener or school evaluation cannot.

Chapters

  • 0:00 —  The label vs. the profile
  • 0:18 —  Dyslexia is not one condition
  • 0:42 —  What happens without subtype identification
  • 1:19 —  The six profiles and what each one requires
  • 1:35 —  Phonological subtype
  • 1:59 —  Surface / Orthographic subtype
  • 2:20 —  Double Deficit
  • 3:13 —  RAN / Fluency
  • 3:30 —  Working Memory
  • 4:20 —  Why the profile matters
  • 5:30 —  What a deep assessment actually measures
  • 6:01 —  All assessment components explained
  • 8:28 —  What this means for your child
View Transcript

0:00
Most parents leave a dyslexia evaluation with a label. What they actually need is a profile. The label tells you your child has dyslexia. The profile tells you what to do about it. I know because I sat in that chair too. And without the profile, the intervention that follows is a guess.

0:18
Here’s what most parents are never told. Dyslexia is not one condition. It presents across multiple distinct profiles, each driven by a different breakdown in the reading system. The intervention must match the breakdown. Two children sitting in the same classroom, both labeled dyslexic, may need programs that look nothing alike. Giving them the same program doesn’t help one of them.

0:42
What happens without subtype identification? Research has put a number on it, and it is not a small number. Children who received intervention not matched to their deficit profile showed no meaningful progress after 100 hours of instruction. The same 100 hours matched to the right profile moved children from below grade level to the average range, a documented 22-point standard score gain.

1:08
100 hours is approximately one full school year of intervention sessions. The only variable between those two outcomes was whether the assessment identified the correct target first.

1:19
The six profiles and what each one requires. In the classroom, two of these children can look identical. The breakdown underneath is completely different. The intervention must match the breakdown, not the behavior.

1:35
Phonological subtype. This child cannot decode unfamiliar words. He or she struggles to segment and manipulate speech sounds, fails nonsense word tasks, and guesses at words using context and memory. The intervention must target structured literacy instruction, Orton-Gillingham, Wilson-Barton, with heavy emphasis on phonological awareness and decoding.

1:59
Surface slash orthographic. This child can decode phonetically, but reads slowly because irregular words aren’t automatic. He or she spells phonetically. “Sed” for “said.” Phonics is intact. Sight word memory is weak. The intervention must target structured literacy with heavier weighting on orthographic awareness. A good structured literacy program addresses both phonological and orthographic processing simultaneously. The orthographic component needs to be front and center for this profile.

2:20
Double deficit. This child has deficits in both phonological processing and rapid naming speed. This is the weakest reader profile. He or she struggles with decoding and cannot automate even words that are learned. The intervention must target structured literacy with intensive weighting across both phonological and fluency components. This is the most demanding profile to remediate. Outcomes are good when correctly identified early.

3:13
RAN slash fluency. This child’s phonological awareness is intact, but reading is very slow. He or she can decode accurately, but cannot automate. This profile is often misidentified as “not really dyslexic.” The intervention must target structured literacy, building fluency through automatic decoding. Additional fluency practice should be layered in. The goal is automaticity — accurate reading that no longer requires conscious effort.

3:30
Working memory. This child decodes words but cannot hold enough of the sentence in memory to comprehend it. He or she can read words accurately but loses meaning by paragraph’s end. The intervention must target working memory support strategies alongside decoding instruction. This must be identified separately or comprehension deficits will be misattributed.

3:55
Mixed slash comorbid. This child has deficits across multiple areas. The condition often co-occurs with ADHD, dysgraphia, or dyscalculia. The profile does not fit cleanly into one subtype. The intervention must target structured literacy with intervention design that accounts for all presenting areas. Co-occurring conditions such as ADHD or dysgraphia must be identified and addressed alongside the literacy program.

4:20
Why the profile matters. A child with a predominantly orthographic profile needs a structured literacy program that addresses both phonological and orthographic processing simultaneously, with orthographic awareness front and center. When intervention is weighted toward the wrong area, progress stalls. The assessment tells you exactly where to weight it.

4:42
Why generic assessment falls short. School evaluations are designed to answer one question. Does this child qualify for services? That’s it. Not what’s wrong. Not what to do. Just whether the threshold is met. A screener tells you a reading problem likely exists. It cannot tell you why. It cannot identify the profile. It cannot guide intervention.

5:06
School evaluations tell you eligibility for special education and broad reading levels. They cannot tell you subtypes, intervention targets, or which cognitive process is intact versus impaired. Screeners tell you risk flags and that a reading problem likely exists. They cannot tell you everything needed to build an intervention, subtypes, profiles, and a roadmap.

5:30
Comprehensive assessments tell you which processes are intact and which are impaired, subtypes, and profiles, along with a specific intervention roadmap. This is the tool that answers the right questions. What a deep assessment actually measures. Each component of a comprehensive assessment builds a different piece of your child’s learning profile. Together, they reveal not just where the difficulty is, but how severe it is, what strengths exist, and exactly where intervention needs to be weighted.

6:01
Phonological processing tells us the ability to hear, segment, and manipulate individual sounds in spoken words. It reveals the primary indicator for phonological dyslexia and double deficit. Rapid automatized naming tells us the speed of retrieving familiar labels from memory, measured independently of phonological processing. It reveals RAN slash fluency and double deficit profiles. This cannot be inferred from phonological scores alone. Decoding skills tell us the ability to sound out both real and nonsense words. This isolates the phonological decoding route by removing memory compensation. It reveals phonological dyslexia and distinguishes a true decoding deficit from compensated reading. Reading fluency tells us speed, accuracy, and expression in connected text, and the gap between decoding ability and automaticity. It reveals the RAN fluency subtype and distinguishes accuracy problems from speed problems.

7:10
Spelling and writing tells us about written expression and orthographic processing, and also screens for dysgraphia comorbidity. It reveals orthographic deficits, comorbid dysgraphia, and surface and mixed presentations. Visual attention tells us about visual processing and tracking abilities that support reading accuracy and efficiency. It reveals visual processing contributions to reading difficulty and informs accommodation recommendations. Comprehension tells us about the reading versus listening comprehension comparison. Strong listening but weak reading points to the reading system, not language ability or intelligence. It distinguishes dyslexia from broader language processing disorders and is critical for correct diagnosis.

7:55
Math skills screens for dyscalculia when indicated by history or presenting concerns. It reveals dyscalculia, mixed learning disability profiles, and co-occurring conditions that affect intervention design. Oral expression, vocabulary, and picture analogies measures verbal reasoning, expressive language, and conceptual thinking independently of reading.

8:13
This area is often a significant strength in dyslexic learners. It documents the gap between a child’s cognitive ability and their reading performance, critical for showing what the child is truly capable of.

8:28
What this means for your child. Getting the diagnosis is not the finish line, it is the starting gun. What comes next, the intervention, the program, the hours, only works if it is aimed at the right target. Every child presents with a unique profile. The areas of difficulty, their severity, and how they combine are different for every learner. That profile is what makes targeted intervention possible.

8:53
At READ Learning Center, our assessment builds that complete picture, strengths and difficulties across phonological processing, decoding, rapid naming, reading fluency, spelling and writing, visual attention, oral expression, vocabulary, comprehension, and math screening when indicated. The report tells you where your child is, what is driving the difficulty, and exactly where intervention needs to be aimed.

9:20
I was not about to let my son fail. That is why we do this work.

Ready to Stop Guessing and Start Knowing?

A comprehensive assessment gives you a subtype, a cognitive profile, and a specific intervention roadmap.

(916) 234-5880  |  2565 Millcreek Dr Suite B, Sacramento, CA 95833

FAQs

What are the different types of dyslexia?

Research identifies multiple distinct profiles: Phonological, Surface/Orthographic, Double Deficit, RAN/Fluency, Working Memory, and Mixed/Comorbid. Each is driven by a different breakdown in the reading system and requires a different primary intervention approach.

Does it matter which type of dyslexia my child has?

Yes — significantly. Research shows children in mismatched programs showed no meaningful progress after 100 hours. The same 100 hours matched to the correct profile produced a 22-point standard score gain. Without profile identification, every intervention decision is a guess.

What can be mistaken for dyslexia?

Several conditions share surface-level symptoms with dyslexia: ADHD, processing speed deficits, vision problems, and general language delays can all look like dyslexia in the classroom. This is exactly why a comprehensive assessment matters. It measures each cognitive system independently so the actual source of the difficulty is identified — not assumed.

Are there mild forms of dyslexia?

Yes. Dyslexia exists on a spectrum from mild to severe. Mild presentations are frequently missed — especially in bright children who develop compensation strategies early. The profile matters regardless of severity. A child with mild dyslexia placed in the wrong intervention will still plateau. Assessment identifies both the profile and the severity so intervention can be weighted correctly.

What does a comprehensive dyslexia assessment include?

Our assessment is a four-step process. We begin with a one-hour parent interview covering your child’s developmental history, early academic experiences, and family history. Your child then completes a 2.5–3 hour standardized assessment battery covering phonological processing, decoding, rapid naming, reading fluency, spelling and writing, visual attention, comprehension, and math screening when indicated. We review all educational records and previous assessments. You receive a detailed written report with specific, research-based intervention recommendations and a parent consultation to walk through the findings.

How is a comprehensive dyslexia assessment different from a school assessment?

School assessments are designed to answer one question: does this child qualify for special education services? They measure broad academic achievement but typically do not assess phonological processing, rapid naming, or other dyslexia-specific indicators independently. Many districts also cannot formally diagnose dyslexia. A comprehensive assessment at READ Learning Center identifies which cognitive systems are intact and which are impaired, provides a clear diagnosis, and delivers a specific intervention roadmap — not an eligibility determination.

How much does a comprehensive dyslexia assessment typically cost?

At READ Learning Center, our comprehensive dyslexia assessment is $895–$995 depending on the age of the student and their academic history. It includes the parent interview, standardized testing, records review, a detailed written report with research-based recommendations, and a parent consultation. Call (916) 234-5880 to schedule.

LS

About the Author

Leah Skinner, M.Ed.

Leah Skinner, M.Ed., is the founder of READ Learning Center in Sacramento. She holds a Master of Education: Dyslexia Specialist degree, is a doctoral candidate in Reading, Literacy, and Assessment, and has over 20 years of experience as a Certified Dyslexia Therapist. As a mother of five sons — four of whom are dyslexic — she brings both clinical expertise and lived experience to every family she works with.