Learning Differences · Video
Not All Dyslexia Looks the Same
Two children can read at exactly the same level for completely different reasons — and the reason is what decides which instruction will work.
The short answer
Dyslexia is a difficulty with reading, but it is not one difficulty. In one child the breakdown is in hearing and manipulating the sounds in words. In another the sounds are fine and the problem is speed — every word gets decoded correctly and slowly, every time. In another, decoding is accurate and the sentence is gone by the end of it. All three read below grade level. All three need different instruction. That is why a reading level is a starting point and an assessment is the actual answer.
Key takeaways
Two children at the same grade equivalent can have completely different things wrong. The level sets the urgency. The profile sets the plan.
Phonological processing — hearing, separating and manipulating the individual sounds in spoken language — is the most common point of breakdown and the best-evidenced target for instruction. It is where an assessment looks first.
A child can decode almost every word correctly and still be unable to read, because it takes them so long that the meaning falls apart on the way. Accuracy and fluency need measuring separately, and they respond to different instruction.
“Phonological”, “surface”, “double deficit” are descriptions of patterns, and the research on how cleanly they separate is genuinely mixed. What is not in dispute is that the underlying skills differ between children and can be measured.
No profile calls for a different method. Every one of them calls for explicit, systematic instruction in the code. What the assessment decides is where the hours go: more on phonological awareness, more on orthographic patterns, more on fluency, or more on holding meaning across a sentence.
Chapters
- 00:00 Welcome and why this matters
- 00:36 Label vs. profile — the fundamental difference
- 01:32 The real cost of guessing wrong
- 02:04 100 hours: a full school year with no progress
- 02:38 The 22-point gain: same effort, right target
- 03:19 The six dyslexia profiles explained
- 05:04 Why school evaluations aren't enough
- 05:25 What a deep assessment actually does
- 06:21 The diagnosis is the starting gun
- 06:48 You can have a map — not guesswork
What the research actually supports
You will find lists of four, six or eight “types of dyslexia” online, and figures attached to them about how much difference the right match makes — usually presented as settled. They are not, and it is worth knowing where the solid ground is before you read anyone’s report, or any claim on this subject. Including ours.
- The phonological and surface patterns are real, but they do not hold still. Children do group that way at a point in time. Followed over several years, the groupings were only fairly stable, and the authors concluded there was modest evidence for the distinction being valid but not for it being clinically useful on its own.Peterson, R. L., Pennington, B. F., Olson, R. K. & Wadsworth, S. J. (2014). Longitudinal stability of phonological and surface subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading — pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4241299
- The double deficit is a serious idea with serious challenges to it. Wolf and Bowers proposed in 1999 that slow naming speed is a second core deficit alongside phonological processing, and that children with both are the hardest to help. A later review of the whole evidence base concluded that naming speed does not hold up as a separate persistent core deficit, in part because the two are so closely correlated that they are hard to pull apart.Vukovic, R. K. & Siegel, L. S. (2006). The double-deficit hypothesis: a comprehensive analysis of the evidence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39(1), 25–47.
- “Working memory dyslexia” is not a recognised category. Working memory weakness is real, it is commonly measured, and it genuinely affects whether a child can hold a sentence together while decoding it. It is not a type of dyslexia, and no classification system lists it as one.
- What is not in dispute. The underlying skills — phonological awareness, decoding, naming speed, fluency, spelling, working memory, listening comprehension — differ between children, can be measured reliably, and point at different places to put the instructional effort. That is the finding this page rests on, and it does not require anyone to believe in six discrete types.International Dyslexia Association, Definition of Dyslexia — dyslexiaida.org/definition-of-dyslexia
- About the figures in the video. The video cites a hundred hours of mismatched instruction producing no progress, and a twenty-two point standard score gain when the same hours are matched to the profile. Those numbers reflect clinical experience of what the difference can look like, not a published trial, and they should be read that way. The underlying claim — that instruction aimed at the wrong skill wastes a child’s year — is well supported. A specific point gain for your child is not something anyone can promise.
The patterns you will see in a report
These are descriptions, not diagnoses. Most children show some of more than one, and the point of naming them is to say where the instruction should be weighted.
The most common pattern. Unfamiliar words cannot be decoded, nonsense words are very hard, and the child guesses from context and pictures. Instruction is weighted heavily toward phonological awareness and explicit decoding.
Decoding works, letter by letter, every time — including for words the child has met a hundred times. Spelling is phonetic rather than conventional. Instruction is weighted toward orthographic patterns and building automatic recognition.
Phonological skills test as intact and reading is still very slow. These children are sometimes told they are not really dyslexic, because accuracy looks acceptable in isolation. Instruction keeps the code teaching and adds structured work on fluency.
Weakness in phonological processing and in naming speed together. This is typically the hardest profile to move and needs the most instruction, most often — which is worth knowing at the start rather than discovering a year in.
Decoding is accurate but by the end of a long sentence the beginning is gone. Working memory is usually the constraint. Instruction keeps the decoding work and adds explicit strategies for holding and recovering meaning.
Very common, and not a separate category — dyslexia alongside ADHD, dysgraphia or dyscalculia. It matters because the plan has to account for all of it: a child who cannot stay in the lesson cannot benefit from the lesson, however well the reading instruction is targeted.
What a comprehensive assessment measures
- Phonological awareness. Hearing, separating and manipulating sounds in spoken words, with no letters involved. The first place to look, and a weakness here explains most of what appears further down the report.
- Decoding, including nonsense words. Invented words cannot be recognised from memory, so they test decoding itself rather than vocabulary. A large gap between real-word and nonsense-word reading is one of the clearest signals there is.
- Rapid automatized naming. How quickly a child can name a sequence of familiar letters, digits or colours. It is the measure that separates a child who is slow from a child who is inaccurate.
- Reading fluency. Accuracy and rate together, in connected text. This is where a child who decodes correctly but at enormous cost becomes visible.
- Spelling and written expression. Spelling often shows the gap more clearly than reading does, because there is nothing to guess from.
- Reading comprehension against listening comprehension. The gap between what a child understands when they read it and when they hear it is one of the most informative numbers in the report.
- Working memory and oral language. To establish what is intact as well as what is not — and because a strong oral vocabulary alongside weak decoding is the classic profile of a bright child who has been missed.
A report that stops at scores has stopped too early. The part that decides whether the assessment was worth doing is the set of instructional recommendations — what a teacher or tutor should actually do differently on Monday.
Screener, school evaluation, comprehensive assessment
Three different tools answering three different questions. Families are often given one and told it covers all three.
A few minutes, a handful of early skills, a yes or a no. It is designed to sort children into “look closer” and “carry on”, and that is the whole job. It is not a diagnosis and it does not say what is wrong.
It is free, it is thorough, and it is built to answer an eligibility question under the law. It is also the only route to an IEP, which is why it is worth requesting whatever else you do.
Different question, different answer. It measures the profile in detail and produces instructional recommendations rather than an eligibility finding — and the report is yours.
It costs nothing and it is the only path to services. A comprehensive assessment is worth adding when you need the detail an eligibility decision does not require, when the findings do not match what you see, or when you want answers sooner.
What to do once you have the report
- Find the subtest table, not the summary. Composite scores average several measures together, so a real weakness can disappear into an unremarkable overall number. The pattern is in the individual subtests.
- Ask which scores sit furthest below your child's own average. Not below the national average — below their own. That comparison is what identifies the profile and it is a question an assessor can answer in one sentence.
- Check the recommendations name a programme and a frequency. “Structured literacy instruction” is a category. You want the programme, the minutes per week and who is qualified to deliver it.
- Take it to the school. The district has to consider a private evaluation that meets its criteria. It does not have to agree with it, but it does have to look at it, and a detailed report changes the conversation in an eligibility meeting.
- Keep the baseline. Whatever happens next, those scores are the number you will measure the next year against. Without them nobody can tell you whether the instruction worked.
Questions parents ask
What are the different types of dyslexia?
The patterns most often described are phonological (difficulty with the sounds in words), surface or orthographic (accurate but slow, because familiar words never become automatic), a combination of weak phonological processing and slow naming speed, sometimes called a double deficit, and profiles where comprehension collapses because working memory cannot hold the sentence together. It is worth knowing that these are descriptions of patterns rather than fixed diagnostic categories, and the research on how cleanly they separate is mixed. What matters practically is which underlying skills are weak in your child, because that is what decides where the instruction is aimed.
Does it matter which type of dyslexia my child has?
It matters for the weighting, not for the method. Every profile needs structured literacy — explicit, systematic instruction in the relationship between sounds and letters. What the profile changes is where the hours go: a child whose phonological processing is weak needs far more time there, while a child whose decoding is accurate but desperately slow needs the same code instruction plus structured fluency work. Instruction aimed at the average struggling reader is aimed at nobody in particular, which is the practical reason the assessment is worth doing.
What can be mistaken for dyslexia?
Several things, which is why a measured assessment beats a checklist. ADHD can produce inattentive reading that looks like a decoding problem. Slow processing speed can look like dyslexia on a timed task and nothing like it on an untimed one. Uncorrected vision or hearing difficulties, a language delay, and simply having missed a lot of instruction can all produce a child who is behind in reading. An assessment separates these because it measures the components rather than the outcome.
Are there mild forms of dyslexia?
Yes — reading difficulty sits on a continuum, and where a line is drawn is partly a matter of where the cut-off is set. Mild cases are missed constantly, particularly in bright children who compensate well enough to look average while working several times harder than their classmates to get there. A child performing at expectation and exhausted by it is a common profile and a real one.
How is a comprehensive assessment different from the school's?
They answer different questions. A school evaluation establishes whether a child qualifies for special education services, which is a legal determination and the only route to an IEP. A comprehensive assessment is built to identify which specific skills have broken down and what instruction addresses them, and it produces recommendations rather than an eligibility finding. Many families do both, and if you can only do one, start with the free school evaluation.
What happens in a comprehensive assessment?
Four parts: a parent interview covering history and what you see at home, a standardised testing battery of roughly two and a half to three hours across phonological processing, decoding, naming speed, fluency, spelling, comprehension and oral language, a review of school records and any previous reports, and a written report delivered in a consultation where it is explained rather than handed over. The report should include instructional recommendations, not only scores.
Full transcript
Transcript
About the author
Dr. Leah Skinner, Ed.D.
Founder, READ Learning Center
Dr. Leah Skinner is a Certified Dyslexia Therapist with a Doctor of Education in Reading, Literacy and Assessment and a Master of Education with a specialization in dyslexia. She has more than twenty years of experience in structured literacy, dyslexia intervention and educational advocacy, and founded READ Learning Center and READ Academy of Sacramento.
This video is based on the full article, Identifying Dyslexia by Subtype.
Find out whether the skill is actually moving
A placement assessment shows where reading, writing or math is breaking down and gives you a baseline to measure against — the number that tells you, a term from now, whether the plan is working. Bring the IEP or 504 plan; we will read it with you.
READ Learning Center
2565 Millcreek Dr Suite B, Sacramento, CA 95833